This nice study shows the need to beware of poorly controlled fMRI studies. (In particular: predefined significance thresholds = bad, multiple comparisons correction = good.)
This nice study shows the need to beware of poorly controlled fMRI studies. (In particular: predefined significance thresholds = bad, multiple comparisons correction = good.)
I’m *really* curious what y’all think about this — is it just obvious and spurious?
The point of the paper is that many people have been using bogus analysis on fMRI data, and this is a reductio of said techniques.