I don’t normally post up drafts of papers, but this one might be of interest to some regulars. It is a reply to Bechtel and Mundale’s 1999 Philosophy of Science paper. Neuroscience & Multiple Realization. Comments welcome. I think it’s still a little rough, especially the section on the “grain problem”.
Neuroscience and multiple realization
One comment
Comments are closed.
FYI, there is also the following discussion of the Bechtel and Mundale 1999 paper:
Kim, Sungsu (2002). “Testing Multiple Realizability: A Discussion of Bechtel and Mundale”, Philosophy of Science, 69.
Couch, Mark (2004). “Discussion: A Defense of Bechtel and Mundale.” Philosophy of Science 71: 198–204.