The Allure of Moral Psychology vs. the Foundations of Cognitive Science

In the last month or so, two Ph.D. students at two different schools told me they changed their research focus from foundational topics (such as computational theories of cognition) to moral psychology.  Is this indicative of a trend? Moral psychology is obviously fascinating and has seen much new work in recent …

Neural Computation and the Computational Theory of Cognition

This paper (co-authored with theoretical and experimental neuroscientist Sonya Bahar) is what I’ve been aiming at during all these years.  This is why I made this big fuss over developing an adequate non-semantic account of computation. I think the paper is finally ready to submit, but I’d love to get some …

Call for Papers: On David Chalmers’s “A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition.”

David Chalmers’s 1993 paper, “A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition,” contains his most systematic discussion of computation as a foundation for cognitive science.  The paper has been posted online (https://consc.net/papers/computation.html), discussed, and cited during all these years.  The paper will finally be published in a special issue of the …

What's a good reading against type-identity theory for neuroscientists?

Wayne Wu (CMU) would like to present arguments against type-identity theory to his group of neuroscientists in his phil cog sci class, and he is wondering what papers he should have them read. As the audience is a specific one, he is disinclined to some of the classics (e.g. Kripke’s argument in Naming and …

Back to Top