Brain lesions and multiple realization (Round 2)

Thanks to Buddy, I came up with a way of reconstructing Bechtel and Mundale’s argument that does not rely on the tacit premise that univocal localization entails univocal realization.  Recall that B&M state: Nevertheless, it is important to note that in interpreting these deficits, researchers implicitly reject multiple realization among …

Brain lesions and multiple realization

William Bechtel and Jennifer Mundale make the following comment regarding lesion studies and multiple realization: Nevertheless, it is important to note that in interpreting these deficits, researchers implicitly reject multiple realization among human brains and assume that damage to a brain area in anyone will result in a deficit to …

“Understanding the Embodiment of Perception”

Brains regulars may know that Fred Adams and I have been trying to put up the good fight against extended cognition.  (Rob Rupert has been in there, too, of course.)  We now have five works on the topic “forthcoming.”  Our latest addition to this future literature is a paper of …

SSPP Program

The program for the 2007 SSPP is now available electronically at: https://www.niu.edu/sspp/Program.html.It will be mailed out in hard copy to all current members later next week after it is printed, labeled, stamped, and stuffed.  If you are not currently a member, you can print a copy or (I hope) get …

Given what we know about the lower level …

Scientists often give arguments of the form, “Given what we know about some lower high thing, some higher level thing is not possible.”  Perhaps the most famous case of this for cognitive science is the 100-step rule that connectionists have alluded to.  (This goes, very roughly: given what we know …

Back to Top