It’s time to apply for grad school in philosophy. So, this may be of interest to some readers of this blog. The department of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh has a new area of concentation in the History & Philosophy of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Psychiatry. …
Joshua Knobe was kind enough to write me as follows (reproduced with permission):I was happy to see that you wrote up a description of oursession [two weeks ago at the PSA Meeting], and I’m glad that you are bringing attention to these important questions about the relationship between common sense andscientific …
Given that there is no society for the philosophy of neuroscience, I would like to propose that we try to make ISHPSSB https://www.ishpssb.org/ (Ishkabibble, among frriends) a temporary home for the philosophy of neuroscience https://artsci.wustl.edu/%7Eneuro/index.html community. ISHPSSB is the largest philosophy of biology organization in the world, and it attracts …
Scientists often give arguments of the form, “Given what we know about some lower high thing, some higher level thing is not possible.” Perhaps the most famous case of this for cognitive science is the 100-step rule that connectionists have alluded to. (This goes, very roughly: given what we know …
I just re-read Lexical Competence, by Diego Marconi (MIT Press, 1997), a book that deserves to be read more widely than it has been. Here is my spin on it:Lexical competence is competence in understanding words, a component of general semantic competence (competence in understanding language). Marconi reviews arguments to the …
Some sessions I enjoyed last week at the 2006 PSA in Vancouver:Philosophy in the Trenches: From Naturalized to Experimental Philosophy (of Science)Jonathan Weinberg and Stephen Crowley argued that experimental philosophy is, indeed, philosophy (contrary to some exclusionary views to the effect that ‘experimental philosophy’ is an oxymoron).Karola Stotz presented some …
Bob Gordon sent me this MSNBC.com Article: New study reveals the brain’s ‘steady cam’. Our eyes constantly flit around, but rather than producing a shaky image like that in a jostled video camera, we perceive a coherent scene. Now researchers have identified what could be the brain circuit responsible for …
