Explaining our Actions: A Critique of Common-Sense Theorizing (CUP, 2025)Peter Carruthers 3. Pleasure and desire Much of the remainder of the book evaluates the standard model of action-explanation itself. Chapter 5 discusses decision making in light of one’s beliefs and desires, resulting in intentions to act. Here there is much …
Explaining our Actions: A Critique of Common-Sense Theorizing (CUP, 2025)Peter Carruthers 2. Mental actions Yesterday I emphasized the wide range of actions that fall outside the standard belief-desire model. One payoff from recognizing this variety is that many more mental processes emerge as action-like, too. There are obvious cases that …
Explaining our Actions: A Critique of Common-Sense Theorizing (CUP, 2025)Peter Carruthers 1. Which actions? The proximal goal of Explaining our Actions is to critique the standard belief-desire model of actions and action-explanation, confronting it with our best science. A more distal methodological goal is to show that the methods still …
This week on Brains we will feature a series of posts by Peter Carruthers on his new book, Explaining our Actions. Check it out here: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/explaining-our-actions/8B4B422B43A47D6F473BA2ED8F24D3FF.
The Junior Professor Chair in Philosophy of Perception (PI: Joulia Smortchkova), hosted by the University Grenoble Alpes invites applications for a postdoctoral position in philosophy of perception, in conjunction with the “Mental Files: New Foundations” project (PI: François Recanati), which is hosted by the Collège de France, Paris. The position …
ISPSM 2025 3rd Annual Online Conference Call for Abstracts The International Society for the Philosophy of the Sciences of the Mind (ISPSM) is happy to invite all philosophers working on any science of the mind (broadly construed) to submit an abstract for a paper or a symposium. We particularly encourage submissions from …
Responses to Andrea Blomkvist, Fabrizio Calzavarini and Wade MunroeBence Nanay I have always thought of philosophy as a conversation. I know, not a very original take, Socrates and all, but it’s true. A conversation not just with other philosophers but also a conversation between disciplines. That is part of why …
